Understanding how biological visual systems process information is challenging because of the nonlinear relationship between visual input and neuronal responses. Artificial neural networks allow computational neuroscientists to create predictive models that connect biological and machine vision. Machine learning has benefited tremendously from benchmarks that compare different models on the same task under standardized conditions. However, there was no standardized benchmark to identify state-of-the-art dynamic models of the mouse visual system. To address this gap, we established the SENSORIUM 2023 Benchmark Competition with dynamic input, featuring a new large-scale dataset from the primary visual cortex of ten mice.

Our environment is riddled with sensory stimuli that are noisy, ambiguous, and often incomplete, necessitating organisms to handle uncertainty in their sensory observations.

Understanding how biological visual systems process information is challenging because of the nonlinear relationship between visual input and neuronal responses. Artificial neural networks allow computational neuroscientists to create predictive models that connect biological and machine vision.Machine learning has benefited tremendously from benchmarks that compare different models on the same task under standardized conditions. However, there was no standardized benchmark to identify state-of-the-art dynamic models of the mouse visual system.To address this gap, we established the SENSORIUM 2023 Benchmark Competition with dynamic input, featuring a new large-scale dataset from the primary visual cortex of ten mice. This dataset includes responses from 78,853 neurons to 2 hours of dynamic stimuli per neuron, together with behavioral measurements such as running speed, pupil dilation, and eye movements.The competition ranked models in two tracks based on predictive performance for neuronal responses on a held-out test set: one focusing on predicting in-domain natural stimuli and another on out-of-distribution (OOD) stimuli to assess model generalization.As part of the NeurIPS 2023 Competition Track, we received more than 160 model submissions from 22 teams. Several new architectures for predictive models were proposed, and the winning teams improved the previous state-of-the-art model by 50\%. Access to the dataset as well as the benchmarking infrastructure will remain online at www.sensorium-competition.net.

We characterized the generalization capabilities of deep neural network encoding models when predicting neuronal responses from the visual cortex to flashed images. We collected MacaqueITBench, a large-scale dataset of neuronal population responses from the macaque inferior temporal (IT) cortex to over $300,000$ images, comprising $8,233$ unique natural images presented to seven monkeys over $109$ sessions. Using MacaqueITBench, we investigated the impact of distribution shifts on models predicting neuronal activity by dividing the images into Out-Of-Distribution (OOD) train and test splits. The OOD splits included variations in image contrast, hue, intensity, temperature, and saturation. Compared to the performance on in-distribution test images---the conventional way in which these models have been evaluated---models performed worse at predicting neuronal responses to out-of-distribution images, retaining as little as $20\\%$ of the performance on in-distribution test images. Additionally, the relative ranking of different models in terms of their ability to predict neuronal responses changed drastically across OOD shifts. The generalization performance under OOD shifts can be well accounted by a simple image similarity metric---the cosine distance between image representations extracted from a pre-trained object recognition model is a strong predictor of neuronal predictivity under different distribution shifts.

Prevailing theories of perception hypothesize that the brain implements perception via Bayesian inference in a generative model of the world.One prominent theory, the Neural Sampling Code (NSC), posits that neuronal responses to a stimulus represent samples from the posterior distribution over latent world state variables that cause the stimulus.Although theoretically elegant, NSC does not specify the exact form of the generative model or prescribe how to link the theory to recorded neuronal activity.Previous works assume simple generative models and test their qualitative agreement with neurophysiological data.Currently, there is no precise alignment of the normative theory with neuronal recordings, especially in response to natural stimuli, and a quantitative, experimental evaluation of models under NSC has been lacking.Here, we propose a novel formalization of NSC, that (a) allows us to directly fit NSC generative models to recorded neuronal activity in response to natural images, (b) formulate richer and more flexible generative models, and (c) employ standard metrics to quantitatively evaluate different generative models under NSC.Furthermore, we derive a stimulus-conditioned predictive model of neuronal responses from the trained generative model using our formalization that we compare to neural system identification models.We demonstrate our approach by fitting and comparing classical-and flexible deep learning-based generative models on population recordings from the macaque primary visual cortex (V1) to natural images, and show that the flexible models outperform classical models in both their generative-and predictive-model performance.Overall, our work is an important step towards a quantitative evaluation of NSC. It provides a framework that lets us \textit{learn} the generative model directly from neuronal population recordings, paving the way for an experimentally-informed understanding of probabilistic computational principles underlying perception and behavior.

In the early visual system, high dimensional natural stimuli are encoded into the trains of neuronal spikes that transmit the information to the brain to produce perception. However, is all the visual scene information required to explain the neuronal responses? In this work, we search for answers to this question by developing a joint model of the natural visual input and neuronal responses using the Information Bottleneck (IB) framework that can represent features of the input data into a few latent variables that play a role in the prediction of the outputs. The correlations between data samples acquired from published experiments on ex-vivo retinas are accounted for in the model by a Gaussian Process (GP) prior. The proposed IB-GP model performs competitively to the state-of-the-art feedforward convolutional networks in predicting spike responses to natural stimuli.